Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as securities intermediary v. PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023mc00152
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Petitioner:
Scott A Huff
Defendant:
PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Estate of Russell Mechling, by its Executor Ellen Ulmer v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2023mc00098
Plaintiff:
Estate of Russell Mechling, by its Executor Ellen Ulmer
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Interested Party:
ITM TwentyFirst, LLC
AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP. v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2023mc00089
Plaintiff:
AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP.
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CONWAY v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2018cv04916
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. CONWAY, IV
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASTRY v. U.S. BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv04380
Plaintiff:
GERARD CASTRY
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, N.A., TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TRUSTEE FOR THE PHEA v. RHODES
as 2:2017cv01774
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TRUSTEE FOR THE PHEA
Defendant:
AISHA RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
