Cases 41 - 50 of 52
RULL v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02852
Plaintiff:
CARIDAD RULL
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STOEHER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv02846
Plaintiff:
RONAL STOEHER
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PABON v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02851
Plaintiff:
THANIA PABON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARLEY v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02847
Plaintiff:
ANNIE FARLEY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC , JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FIERRO v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02849
Plaintiff:
SHELIA FIERRO
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KERR v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02850
Plaintiff:
INGRID KERR
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PESJAR v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02848
Plaintiff:
RODERICK PESJAR
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC , JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORMAN et al v. MORTGAGEIT et al
as 2:2011cv03196
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. ORMAN and LESLIE E. ESPOSITO
Defendant:
MORTGAGEIT, CITIMORTGAGE, FANNIE MAE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
LOUGHRY et al v. PNC MORTGAGE et al
as 2:2010cv06728
Plaintiff:
SEAN A. LOUGHRY and LISA R. LOUGHRY
Defendant:
PNC MORTGAGE , NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAGGART v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP et al
as 2:2010cv01223
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. TAGGART
Defendant:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BANK OF NEW YORK-MELLON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
