Cases 41 - 50 of 183
KEITH VALLEY PARTNERSHIP, L.P. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF NAVY et al
as 2:2017cv03740
Plaintiff:
KEITH VALLEY PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD V. SPENCER, ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES CLAIMING TO BENEFIT FROM THE RESTRICTIVE EASEMENT CONTAINED IN THE AMENDED DECLARATION OF TAKING DATED JANUARY 28, 1985 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHULTZ
as 5:2017cv03551
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KIMBERLY L. SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAUMAN
as 2:2017cv03070
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES M. LAUMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REED
as 5:2017cv01424
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ERIN E. REED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SPELGATTI
as 5:2017cv01423
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LONNA KAY SPELGATTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MCCLOUD et al
as 5:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KIM MCCLOUD and MICHAEL MCCLOUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HEATH et al
as 5:2017cv00522
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ERNEST HEATH and UNKNOWN HEIRS OF BETH UNTERMYER, DECEASED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SARRO et al
as 2:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MICHAEL SARRO
Defendant:
JULIE L. SARRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HAUSMAN
as 5:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LINDA D. HAUSMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAWSON
as 2:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANNA DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
