Cases 11 - 20 of 63
HALE et al v. PITTSBURGH-CORNING
as 2:2011cv62353
Plaintiff:
GLEN T HALE and S GARRARD
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH-CORNING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRODNAX et al v. A. C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60264
Plaintiff:
NEWTON BRODNAX , MILDRED BRODNAX , JUDY HALE and others
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC. , A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES, CO. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALE v. MOORE MCCORMACK LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv57538
Plaintiff:
LOUIS O. HALE
Defendant:
MOORE MCCORMACK LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HALE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53055
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. HALE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HALE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52860
Plaintiff:
EARNEST HALE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COBB et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05095
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. COBB , GARY COOPER , JAMES FRANK and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HALE et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv04887
Plaintiff:
DORIS A. HALE and FRANK HALE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
HALE v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv42142
Plaintiff:
LOUIS O. HALE
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HALE v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv41829
Plaintiff:
LOUIS O. HALE
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HALE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75000
Plaintiff:
THOMAS H. HALE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
