Cases 11 - 20 of 25
MOLINA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv39079
Plaintiff:
EFRAIN L. MOLINA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MOLINA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32285
Plaintiff:
RAMON MOLINA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
XITAS v. MOLINA et al
as 2:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
KELLY XITAS
Defendant:
GIOVANNI MOLINA and MY PRIVATE LABEL, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOLINA v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC.
as 2:2010cv06568
Plaintiff:
MARY MOLINA
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOLINA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54443
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY MOLINA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MOLINA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55014
Plaintiff:
FAUSTO T. MOLINA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MOLINA v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, ET AL.
as 2:2010cv42819
Plaintiff:
FRANK MOLINA
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MOLINA v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76428
Plaintiff:
JORGE L. MOLINA
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOLINA v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76429
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. MOLINA
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARSETH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33274
Plaintiff:
FAUSTO T. MOLINA and FAUSTO T. MOLINA
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
