Cases 21 - 30 of 170
SCOTT v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01258
Plaintiff:
KAY L. SCOTT
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REED v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01260
Plaintiff:
DONNA KAY REED
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv00637
Plaintiff:
SANDRA KAY DAVIS
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILKINSON et al v. AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2014cv05498
Plaintiff:
JERRY WILKINSON and KAY WILKINSON
Defendant:
AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROCKWELL v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05352
Plaintiff:
KAY FRANCES ROCKWELL
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOUDREAU et al v. PFIZER INC.
as 2:2014cv01134
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH KAY BOUDREAU and RICHARD N. BOUDREAU
Defendant:
PFIZER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEELEY et al v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07324
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN KAY KEELEY and KERRY KEELEY
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC., MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS et al v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2013cv07070
Plaintiff:
KAY MORRIS and WAYNE MORRIS
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DORSEY v. TRADER JOE'S COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv06966
Plaintiff:
KAY DORSEY
Defendant:
TRADER JOE'S COMPANY and TRADER JOE'S EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AGEE et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON et al
as 2:2007cv63027
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION, COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY AGEE, J.C. ALLEN, CHARLES ERWIN ANDERSON and others
Petitioner:
FRED C MCDONNELL and JAMES H REA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
