Cases 31 - 40 of 95
MIDDLEBROOK v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02443
Plaintiff:
TAMMIE L. MIDDLEBROOK
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KILLEN v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02233
Plaintiff:
TAMMY KILLEN
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SARTIN v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01259
Plaintiff:
TAMMY L. SARTIN
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAYES v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv00966
Plaintiff:
TAMMY JEAN HAYES
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER-VODIO v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00449
Plaintiff:
TAMMY R. BUTLER-VODIO
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON COMPANY, JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALDWELL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03544
Plaintiff:
TAMMY CALDWELL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WULLENWEBER v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv07073
Plaintiff:
TAMMY WULLENWEBER
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHISM v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as 2:2013cv07064
Plaintiff:
TAMMY CHISM
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PERRAS v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as 2:2013cv06944
Plaintiff:
TAMMY PERRAS
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORTIZ et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05875
Plaintiff:
ESTHER ORTIZ , EDWARD CARTER , CYNDEE CARTY and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
