Cases 31 - 40 of 435
ZHANG v. YOUNG
as 2:2017cv02706
Plaintiff:
AILIN ZHANG
Defendant:
ANTHONY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01336
Plaintiff:
WANDA YOUNG
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. , MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and ANN REDFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TOCZEK et al v. YOUNG et al
as 5:2016cv06262
Plaintiff:
KYONG TOCZEK and MICHAEL TOCZEK
Defendant:
LEE FREDERICK YOUNG and NEW PRIME, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. MOSLEY et al
as 2:2016cv03976
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE YOUNG
Defendant:
RICHARD MOSLEY and SERVICE ENERGY TRANSPORT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. STEPHAN
as 2:2016cv02355
Plaintiff:
SHAKEERA YOUNG
Defendant:
RICHARD STEPHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BAILEY et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv02166
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY BAILEY , MICHELLE GARCIA , ROBIN STEPHENSON and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG et al v. EUBANK et al
as 2:2015cv06573
Plaintiff:
ROBERT YOUNG , DEBORAH NELSON YOUNG , SCOTT SAVOY and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY EUBANK, GOOSE MAN LLC and UP & AWAY GOOSE CONTROL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv04602
Plaintiff:
CHESTER YOUNG
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. SOLIMAN et al
as 2:2015cv04522
Plaintiff:
MAMIE YOUNG
Defendant:
ANTHONY SOLIMAN, EAN HOLDINGS, LLC, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYONS v. SOLIMAN et al
as 2:2015cv02284
Plaintiff:
KESHA LYONS
Defendant:
ANTHONY SOLIMAN, EAN HOLDINGS, LLC, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
