Cases 41 - 50 of 92
ALLEN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01281
Plaintiff:
ERIC ALLEN , LYNN ALLEN , ROBERT DELPINO and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOCKARD v. CUISINART
as 2:2011cv07716
Plaintiff:
CATHY LOCKARD
Defendant:
CUISINART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAPPS et al v. ORTIZ
as 2:2011cv04870
Plaintiff:
CATHY MAPPS , EDITH RAGIN and JOAN RAGIN
Defendant:
JOSE ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TYGART et al v. AM RESORTS, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03714
Plaintiff:
CATHY SUE TYGART and LARRY TYGART
Defendant:
AM RESORTS, LLC , ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL, INC. , ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NIRDLINGER et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv64394
Plaintiff:
CLINTON G NIRDLINGER and CATHY J NIRDLINGER
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAXLEY v. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC et al
as 2:2011cv63922
Plaintiff:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY
Defendant:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC , ALCO PRODUCTS INC, ALLEN-BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01728
Plaintiff:
CATHY MASON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHITTEN et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62018
Plaintiff:
RAY ELMER WHITTEN and CATHY WHITTEN
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REYNOLDS v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61395
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
CATHY M. REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2011cv00299
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHNSON and CATHY JOHNSON
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
