Cases 51 - 60 of 90
ELLIS v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 2:2012cv03875
Plaintiff:
SALIMA F. ELLIS
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO. , WALGREEN HOME CARE, INC. , WALGREEN EASTERN CO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAMOS et al v. WALGREENS EASTERN CO., INC.
as 2:2012cv03383
Plaintiff:
LUZ RAMOS and OSWALDO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
WALGREENS EASTERN CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv03185
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, LLC , WALGREEN'S DISTRIBUTION CENTER, INC. , WALGREEN EASTERN COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HODGES v. WALGREENS et al
as 2:2012cv01162
Plaintiff:
BONNIE HODGES
Defendant:
WALGREENS and WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MICHAEL v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 2:2012cv01161
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO. , WALGREEN COMPANY , WALGREEN'S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOMAO et al v. BROGAN LANDSCAPING, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
BARBRAR TOMAO and MICHAEL TOMAO
Defendant:
BROGAN LANDSCAPING, INC., HIGHLAND YORKTOWN ASSOCIATES, LP, HIGHLAND YORKTOWN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROLAND v. WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.
as 2:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
BRENDA ROLAND
Defendant:
WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ATIYEH v. WALGREEN'S et al
as 5:2011cv07399
Plaintiff:
NINA ATIYEH
Defendant:
WALGREEN'S , WALGREEN'S DRUG STORE , WALGREEN'S EASTERN CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PETSIS v. WALGREENS
as 2:2011cv07146
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PETSIS
Defendant:
WALGREENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MICHAEL et al v. WALGREEN COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv06680
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL and MARY MICHAEL
Defendant:
WALGREEN COMPANY , WALGREEN'S , WALGREEN'S PHARMACY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
