Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Paw v. ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv04256
Plaintiff:
Thay Kaw Paw
Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC, ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL GROUP, INC., ARAMARK and others
Cross Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., HONEYWELL SAFETY PRODUCTS USA, INC., JBS S.A. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A-D2 SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
TRAN v. JOSEPH'S TOWING & COLLISION CARE, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2021cv01886
Defendant:
JOSEPH'S TOWING & COLLISION CARE, INCORPORATED, JOHN DOE #6-10, JAMES FRISON and others
Plaintiff:
CECILIA TRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHABALINA et al v. BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00212
Defendant:
BAYLOR REALTY, INC., JOHN DOES 1-5, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NATALIA SHABALINA and SERGEY TSYURYUPA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
JOHN DOE 6 v. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2013cv00336
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 6
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY , THE SECOND MILE and GERALD SANDUSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GERGEL v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01624
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GERGEL
Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., JOHN DOE (1), JOHN DOE (2) and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
QUILES et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2008cv02189
Plaintiff:
RAUL ZAMBRANA- QUILES, JANE DOE 1, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ZAMBRANA DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PARRETTA et al v. GEORGE BALLOUZ CONTRACTORS et al
as 2:2007cv01489
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PARRETTA and CONNIE PARRETTA
Defendant:
GEORGE BALLOUZ CONTRACTORS, JOHN DOE CONTRACTORS #1-5, JOHN DOE #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
