Cases 1 - 10 of 83
VAUGHN et al v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
MONTRELL VAUGHN and CAROLYN VAUGHN
Defendant:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. and MARVIN BRINKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Singh v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2023cv03415
Plaintiff:
Gagandeep Singh
Defendant:
Cameron T Vaughn and Seth V Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Singh v. Vaughn
as 2:2023cv03415
Plaintiff:
Gagandeep Singh
Defendant:
Seth V Vaughn and Cameron T Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DIAWARA et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv01793
Plaintiff:
SOGBEH DIAWARA and MOHAMED DIAWARA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RODNEY VAUGHN CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
VAUGHN v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY VAUGHN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Neal v. Vaughn
as 5:2021cv03950
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewhitt Neal
Defendant:
Ryan Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAUGHN et al v. BRIDLE PATH WOODS ASSOC., LP
as 5:2020cv04965
Defendant:
BRIDLE PATH WOODS ASSOC., LP and BRIDLE PATH WOODS ASSOC., LP doing business as BRIDLE PATH APARTMENTS
Plaintiff:
SHAMELIA VAUGHN and ANTHONY VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAUGHN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00749
Plaintiff:
EARL VAUGHN and VICTORIA VAUGHN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAUGHN et al v. CARANCIUC et al
as 5:2018cv01790
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VAUGHN and JENNIFER VAUGHN
Defendant:
VLADISLAV CARANCIUC , HANDY TRANSPORTATION, INC. and ACCORD FREIGHT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENNETT v. HICKSON et al
as 2:2018cv01380
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BENNETT
Defendant:
VAUGHN HICKSON and MILDRED SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
