Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HANF et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv06072
Plaintiff:
JOHN HANF and KATHLEEN HANF
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., CHASE HOME FINANCE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 5211
HINTON v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv04419
Plaintiff:
DONNA HINTON
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
DRAGOS v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC
as 2:2011cv04378
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DRAGOS
Defendant:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
TURNER v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC
as 2:2011cv04031
Plaintiff:
DORCINE TURNER
Defendant:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WILLIAMS et al v. ALLIED MORTGAGE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03882
Plaintiff:
DAISHA WILLIAMS and ZAKI BEY
Defendant:
ALLIED MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., VADIM KLIGMAN, CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BOWMAN et al v. CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC.
as 2:2011cv01597
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BOWMAN and ELIZABETH BOWMAN
Defendant:
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DEMARCO REI, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv07242
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DEMARCO REI, INC., OPM GROUP, LLC and ANTHONY J. DEMARCO, III
Movant:
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Mail Fraud Injunction
CLAYPOLE et al v. CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC et al
as 2:2010cv05003
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. CLAYPOLE and DIANA MISSIMER CLAYPOLE
Defendant:
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC , DUANE MORRIS LLP and PHELAN, HALLIANAN & SCHMEIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
