Cases 11 - 20 of 38
SCOTT et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv39780
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SCOTT, SR. and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCOTT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57614
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. SCOTT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SCOTT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51423
Plaintiff:
KENT L. SCOTT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SCOTT v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv79276
Plaintiff:
GEORGE L. SCOTT
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv79010
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. SCOTT and LINDA F. SCOTT
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77565
Plaintiff:
LESTER L. SCOTT
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77564
Plaintiff:
KENT L. SCOTT
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv37437
Plaintiff:
EMMETT L. SCOTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SCOTT v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34016
Plaintiff:
HENRY L. SCOTT
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SCOTT v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34023
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SCOTT, SR.
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
