Cases 11 - 20 of 35
SCHULTZ v. UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv03511
Plaintiff:
NICOLA D SCHULTZ
Defendant:
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY and SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEST v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2021cv03077
Plaintiff:
TAMYRA BEST
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
O'DONNELL v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2021cv01694
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Plaintiff:
VICKI O'DONNELL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
JOHNSON v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2021cv01393
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
CREITZ v. READING HEALTH SYSTEM SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN et al
as 5:2019cv01576
Defendant:
READING HEALTH SYSTEM SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN and SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Plaintiff:
HEATHER CREITZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BERMAN v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, INC.
as 2:2019cv01249
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, INC.
Plaintiff:
JASON BERMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
WALSH v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2018cv03869
Plaintiff:
MARCI WALSH
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MULLEN v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA et al
as 2:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN MULLEN
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA and MEDICAL GROUP INS. SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
FOLKER v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 5:2017cv03496
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH C. FOLKER
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
RYAN v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2017cv02806
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
