Cases 21 - 30 of 104
SMITH v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05169
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
PAUL L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAFER-ISAAC v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05173
Plaintiff:
TINA L. SHAFER-ISAAC
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pridemore v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04627
Plaintiff:
William B. Pridemore
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PYLES v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04617
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Pyles and JOSEPH DAVID PYLES
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ubel v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv04630
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Justin Ubel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv04632
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
William Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dohan v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv04631
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Douglas J Dohan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv04302
Plaintiff:
Diana Long
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv04263
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CURRY
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arkadyey et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv04280
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC and others
Plaintiff:
Yuri Arkadyev
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
