Cases 21 - 30 of 51
RENNINGER v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2013cv06278
Plaintiff:
PAMELA L. RENNINGER
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. v. GAKOUMIS et al
as 2:2013cv00761
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
GEORGE GAKOUMIS and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Counter_claimant:
GEORGE GAKOUMIS
Counter_defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cross_claimant:
GEORGE GAKOUMIS
Cross_defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MATTEO et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2012cv03878
Plaintiff:
LOUIS MATTEO and NANCY MATTEO
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. v. GAKOUMIS et al
as 2:2012cv02591
Defendant:
GEORGE GAKOUMIS and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEMMON et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2012cv02371
Plaintiff:
CICERO LEMMON, III and LORA JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANTUM v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND, MERSCORP et al
as 2:2011cv04431
Plaintiff:
JEMILL BANTUM
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND, MERSCORP, MERITOR SAVINGS BANK, MERITOR FINICIAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ORMAN et al v. MORTGAGEIT et al
as 2:2011cv03196
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. ORMAN and LESLIE E. ESPOSITO
Defendant:
MORTGAGEIT, CITIMORTGAGE, FANNIE MAE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
DEROSA et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2011cv02914
Plaintiff:
DAVID G. DEROSA , ERIN N. LOGAN , JANIE L. GLOVER and others
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITING v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2011cv02318
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. WHITING
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
