Cases 51 - 60 of 117
SMITH et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81568
Plaintiff:
HARRY E. SMITH and MARGARET A. SMITH
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51989
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79542
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79297
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. SMITH and BERTIE J. SMITH
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41705
Plaintiff:
CAESAR E. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77722
Plaintiff:
IRA E. SMITH
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77732
Plaintiff:
OLSEN E. SMITH
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A.L. PIERCE
as 2:2010cv50598
Plaintiff:
GLEN E SMITH
Defendant:
A.L. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv50599
Plaintiff:
GLEN E SMITH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH v. THE ANACONDA COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv68852
Defendant:
THE ANACONDA COMPANY , THE A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO. , ACANDS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROY E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
