Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC v. C & L DINERS, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv04566
Defendant:
C & L N.S., LLC, C & L CRANSTON, LLC, C & L AM, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREDA v. C. L. PRESSER COMPANY
as 2:2014cv03117
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FREDA
Defendant:
C. L. PRESSER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SUSQUEHANNA COMMERCIAL FINANCE, INC. v. C & L SERVICE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05256
Plaintiff:
SUSQUEHANNA COMMERCIAL FINANCE, INC.
Defendant:
C & L SERVICE CORPORATION and BARBARA L. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ROBBS et al v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61318
Plaintiff:
C. L. ROBBS and VELMA ROBBS
Defendant:
NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72381
Plaintiff:
C. L. ROBERTS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TANNER v. A.C. AND S. INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89875
Plaintiff:
C L TANNER
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC., A.C. AND S. INC., A.C. AND S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
THOMPSON v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85709
Plaintiff:
C. L. THOMPSON, C. L. THOMPSON and C. L. THOMPSON
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., RAILROAD FRICTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COOLEY v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77550
Plaintiff:
C. L. COOLEY
Defendant:
TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HUGHES v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63820
Plaintiff:
C. L. HUGHES
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
