Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Abrams et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Patricia L. Abrams , James W. Alexander , James F. Allen and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Prison Legal News et al v. Kane et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News , Daniel Denvir , Philadelphia City Paper and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane and R. Seth Williams
Amicu:
Amy B Ginensky and Eli M. Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yinger v. Ability Recovery Services, LLC
as 1:2014cv01514
Plaintiff:
Daniel Yinger
Defendant:
Ability Recovery Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
O. et al v. Mackereth
as 1:2014cv01110
Plaintiff:
Sonny O., Jr. , Sonny O., Sr. , Daniel D. and others
Defendant:
Beverly Mackereth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Rivera-Morales
as 1:2013mc00532
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Daniel Rivera-Morales
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hatch et al v. The First Liberty Insurance Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv02601
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hatch and Andrea Hatch
Defendant:
The First Liberty Insurance Corp. , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wasserman v. Burrell et al
as 1:2012cv01521
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Wasserman
Defendant:
Gregory T. Burrell , Joseph A. Fluehr, III , Michael Gerdes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Insurance Newsnet.com, Inc. et al v. Pardine et al
as 1:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
Insurance Newsnet.com, Inc. and Paul Felman
Defendant:
Daniel J. Pardine and Matthew Pardine
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
