Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Arnold et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01345
Plaintiff:
Paul H. Arnold , Theodore R Babcock , Connie R Babcock and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Abrams et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01346
Plaintiff:
Robert C Abrams, Jr. , Sonya M Abrams , James M Allen and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC et al v. Bateman et al
as 1:2016cv00898
Plaintiff:
Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC , GGNSC Camp Hill West Shore, LP , GGNSC Camp Hill West Shore GP LLC and others
Defendant:
Donna M. Bateman and Doris J. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation v. DeGroat
as 1:2013mc00256
Plaintiff:
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
Defendant:
Donna DeGroat
Movant:
Office of Inspector General
United States Of America v. H.B. Williams, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01466
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
H.B. Williams, Inc., Donna L. Williams, Jeffrey D. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0332
Kirkpatrick v. I.C. Systems, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Donna Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
I.C. Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
