Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Bennett v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2008cv02055
Plaintiff:
Laura M. Bennett
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Foot Locker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McLauglin et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2008cv01267
Plaintiff:
Darrell C McLauglin and Susan L McLauglin
Defendant:
Nathan M Wetzel, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hollinger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Met Disability
as 1:2008cv00306
Plaintiff:
Robert Hollinger and Robert Hollinger
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Met Disability
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Maira v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
Andrea Maira
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
O'Brien v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv01935
Plaintiff:
Mabel D. O'Brien
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Weiland-Svecz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv01062
Plaintiff:
Trasi Weiland-Svecz
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Crouse v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2007cv01066
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Crouse and Edward A. Crouse
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Crouse v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2007cv01066
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Crouse and Edward A. Crouse
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Conmy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv00430
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Conmy
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counterclaim Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counterclaim Defendant:
Robert E. Conmy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Arscott v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv00125
Plaintiff:
Karen E. Arscott
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
