Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
Patrice McCaulley, Debra Bales, Philip Spence and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Care Services Management, LLC et al v. Premier Mobile Dentistry of VA., LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01095
Plaintiff:
Care Services Management, LLC and Marquis Health Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Premier Mobile Dentistry of VA., LLC and Matthew Daniel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Smith v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02298
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cunningham v. Park Lane Digital Media et al
as 3:2015cv00467
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Park Lane Digital Media, Ardalan Afshar, Ian Greenfield and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Daniel v. ProCollect, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00571
Plaintiff:
Ashly Daniel
Defendant:
ProCollect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Morley v. Price et al
as 3:2012cv01067
Plaintiff:
Brad Morley
Defendant:
Danielle Price and Michael Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Smith v. SSS Secure Holdings, LLC
as 3:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Defendant:
SSS Secure Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Smith v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
as 3:2011cv01055
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Adams et al v. MGC Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00809
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Adams and Erika G. Adams
Defendant:
MGC Mortgage, Inc. , Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. and LLP Mortgage Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samples v. Global Credit & Collection Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Stephen Samples
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collection Inc. , Global Credit & Collection Corporation, Martin Sugar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
