Cases 1 - 10 of 37
James v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
John James
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sullivan v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2020cv00069
Plaintiff:
Michael James Sullivan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wyrich v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv00682
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
James C. Wyrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mullin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
James Ira Mullin
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cobble v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Cobble
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Edmondson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv01060
Plaintiff:
James Theodore Edmondson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
James v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Larry W. James
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Witte v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv00580
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Witte
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burnette v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
James Robert Burnette
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Caseldine v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv02339
Plaintiff:
Donald James Caseldine
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
