Cases 101 - 110 of 281
WSPTN Corp. et al v. Tennessee Department of Health, Council for Hearing Instrument Specialists et al
as 3:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
WSPTN Corp. , The Hearing Group, LLC , Bell Hearing Aids, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Health, Council for Hearing Instrument Specialists, Thomas Stewart, Randy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Ambest, Inc. v. Schepmann
as 3:2015cv00817
Plaintiff:
AMBEST, Inc.
Defendant:
David William Schepmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cunningham v. Peak Legal Advocates et al
as 3:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Peak Legal Advocates, Debt Pay Gateway, Inc., Susan Lafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marshall et al v. ESPN Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01945
Plaintiff:
Javon Marshall , Steven Clarke , Chris Conner and others
Defendant:
ESPN Inc. , CBS Broadcasting, Inc. , National Broadcasting Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burges et al v. BancorpSouth, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01564
Plaintiff:
William E. Burges and Rose M. Burges
Defendant:
BancorpSouth, Inc. , James D. Rollins, III and William L. Prater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
