Cases 11 - 20 of 281
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Doe (JEB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
John Doe (JEB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
John Does 1-8 v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
John Does 1-8
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (TLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01221
Plaintiff:
John Doe (TLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Selfmade LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Selfmade LLC doing business as Mingles Hookah Lounge and Billie Dee Williams
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Communications Act of 1934
Doe #1 (PTH) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (PTH), John Doe #2 (DMA), John Doe #3 (WCB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (ADD) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
John Doe (ADD)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (OA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
John Doe (OA) and Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (RB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
