Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Selfmade LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01142
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Selfmade LLC doing business as Mingles Hookah Lounge and Billie Dee Williams
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Communications Act of 1934
Dauphinee v. Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01245
Plaintiff: Jayson Dauphinee
Defendant: Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., H. Craig Dees, Timothy C. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Chaney v. Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01243
Plaintiff: Paul Jason Chaney
Defendant: Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., H. Craig Dees, Timothy Craig Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Farrah, et al v. Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 3:2014cv01231
Plaintiff: Cary Farrah and James H. Harrison, Jr.
Defendant: Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., H. Craig Dees, Timothy C. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Scribner v. Donahue et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013mc00098
Petitioner: Robert Dee Scribner, II
Respondent: Michael Donahue and State of Tennessee
Reece v. Whitley et al
as 3:2011mc00067
Plaintiff: James Reece
Defendant: L. Ray Whitley, Tara Wiley, William Lamberth and others
Plummer v. Young et al
as 3:2009mc00178
Plaintiff: Lashon Plummer
Defendant: Brandy Young, Rita Wilson, Carmen Maymi and others
Cook v. Lamberth et al
as 3:2009mc00098
Plaintiff: Ricky Lee Cook
Defendant: William G. Lamberth, II and Dee David Gay
Cook v. Gay et al
as 3:2009mc00044
Plaintiff: Ricky Lee Cook
Defendant: David Dee Gay and William G. Lamberth, II
Morton v. Gay
as 3:2009mc00002
Plaintiff: Timothy L. Morton
Defendant: Sumner County, TN, Dee Gay and James Hunter

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?