Real Property Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Mahamed v. BAC Home Loans Serv LP et al
as 3:2011cv00619
Plaintiff: Flarrie Kimberley Mahamed
Defendant: BAC Home Loans Serv LP , Bank of America, N.A. , Rubin Lublin Suarez Serrano, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01000
Plaintiff: James E. Brown
Defendant: Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, Karl Dean, Sue Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashe et al v. Oneok Partners, G.P., LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00868
Plaintiff: Ronald J. Ashe , John Handshoe , Samantha E. Handshoe and others
Defendant: Oneok Partners, G.P., LLC , Appalachian Pipeline Contractors, L.P. LLP, Austin Powder, Inc, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00606
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency
Defendant: Greyhound Lines, Inc. , Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., James G. Lackey, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America et al v. Land in Rutherford County, TN, an easement and right-of-way over 8.62 acres of land, more or less et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00901
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant: Land in Rutherford County, TN, an easement and right-of-way over 8.62 acres of land, more or less, Barbara Hakala Reavis and Joe E. Reavis
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
United States of America et al v. Land more or less in Putnam County, Tennessee, an easement and right-of-way over 0.56 acre of et al
as 2:2008cv00044
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant: Land more or less in Putnam County, Tennessee, an easement and right-of-way over 0.56 acre of, Ronald E. Jackson, Harold Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
United States of America et al v. Land in Putnam County, Tennessee, Easements and Rights-of-Way Over 15.52 Acres et al
as 2:2008cv00043
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America, Tennessee Valley Authority and others
Defendant: Land in Putnam County, Tennessee, Easements and Rights-of-Way Over 15.52 Acres, Woodrow Jackson, Ronald E. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
United States of America et al v. Land in Hickman County, Tennessee, additional rights with respect to a preexisting easement et al
as 1:2007cv00094
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America, Tennessee Valley Authority and others
Defendant: Land in Hickman County, Tennessee, additional rights with respect to a preexisting easement, Jerry L. Allison and Joan E. Allison
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
United States of America et al v. Land in Putnam County, Tennessee, a temporary right to enter et al
as 2:2007cv00035
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America, Tennessee Valley Authority and others
Defendant: Land in Putnam County, Tennessee, a temporary right to enter, Paul R. Isbell and Sandra E. Isbell
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
United States of America et al v. Land in Rutherford County, Tennessee, a temporary right to enter et al
as 3:2007cv00523
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America, Tennessee Valley Authority and others
Defendant: Land in Rutherford County, Tennessee, a temporary right to enter, Barbara Hakala Reavis and Joe E. Reavis
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?