Cases 31 - 40 of 52
McClain v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01419
Plaintiff:
Dianna R. McClain
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Albert Miller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jo Heady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sosa v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00732
Plaintiff:
Toni K. Sosa
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Wanda Wells
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00731
Plaintiff:
Gloria M. Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
Jill Victoria Armstrong
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Annette Chapman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyler v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
Nicole Denise Tyler
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhoads v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00725
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Juanita Rhoads
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
