Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Harris v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Handley-Miley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00823
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Handley-Miley
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and FirstGroup Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Riley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00799
Plaintiff:
William Riley
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Meadows v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00743
Defendant:
John Doe and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rodney Meadows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01069
Plaintiff:
Levi N. Thomas
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and FirstGroup America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01513
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Folad et al v. Edwards et al
as 3:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
Tony Folad and Zarminia Folad
Defendant:
Terry J. Edwards and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miller
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DeWald et al v. MCR Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00438
Plaintiff:
Terri DeWald and Scott DeWald
Defendant:
MCR Transport, Inc. and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper et al v. Alexander et al
as 3:2011cv00358
Plaintiff:
Barbara J Cooper and LaJoy Cooper
Defendant:
Charlie Alexander, Greyhound Lines Inc , Bekir Osmicevic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
