Cases 71 - 80 of 997
Merritt v. WIPRO LIMITE3D
as 2:2023cv02452
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Merritt
Defendant:
WIPRO LIMITE3D
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Rakowsky v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2023cv02340
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rakowsky
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anglea et al v. Flash Market, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02621
Plaintiff:
Amber Anglea, Clara Ballard, Tanna Ballard and others
Defendant:
Flash Market, LLC and PFMFC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gomez v. D & M Bolanos Drywall, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gomez
Defendant:
D & M Bolanos Drywall, LLC, Mirna Bolanos, David Bolanos and others
Boulton v. Millennium Search, LLC
as 2:2023cv02304
Plaintiff:
Alexander Boulton
Defendant:
Millennium Search, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Coleman v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02200
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon Logistics, Inc., Amazon.Com Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Orellana v. Universal Paradise Tile & Plaster et al
as 2:2023cv02317
Plaintiff:
Manuel Orellana
Defendant:
Universal Paradise Tile & Plaster and Mauricio Rubio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Freeman v. Bolden Tire and Trailer Repair, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Timothy Freeman
Defendant:
Bolden Tire and Trailer Repair, LLC and Carin Bolden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Warren v. Chester County, Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Anthony Warren
Defendant:
Chester County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanders v. SQA Mahadev, LLC
as 2:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
Shamona Sanders
Defendant:
SQA Mahadev, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
