Cases 151 - 160 of 529
Walls v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02835
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Grace Walls
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Parchman v. SLM Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02819
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Parchman
Defendant:
SLM Corporation , Navient Corporation and Navient Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Norman v. ECPI University
as 2:2015cv02802
Plaintiff:
Wayne H. Norman
Defendant:
ECPI University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leach v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2015cv02793
Plaintiff:
Miqwon Leach
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Drozdowski et al v. Citibank, N.A.
as 2:2015cv02786
Plaintiff:
Monika Drozdowski and Robert Drozdowski
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Branch Communications, LLC v. City of Jackson, Tennessee Board of Zoning Appeals et al
as 1:2015cv01286
Plaintiff:
Branch Communications, LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Tennessee Board of Zoning Appeals, Mamie Hutcherson-Cooper, Max Hart , Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Mitchell v. Firstsource Solutions USA, LLC
as 2:2015cv02763
Plaintiff:
Kathy Mitchell
Defendant:
Firstsource Solutions USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walls et al v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02758
Plaintiff:
Adam Walls and Grace Walls
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sikes v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01274
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sikes
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AutoZone Parts, Inc. v. Red Hot International, LLC, et al.
as 2:2015cv02706
Plaintiff:
AutoZone Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Red Hot International, LLC, Midland American Capital Corporation, Rhi Global, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
