Cases 131 - 140 of 2,034
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. BeLeaf, LLC d/b/a BeLeaf Cigar Company et al
as 2:2022cv02454
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
BeLeaf, LLC d/b/a BeLeaf Cigar Company, Antonio Gardner and Jason Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pruitt v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv02908
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Buff City Soap LLC et al v. Bynum et al
as 2:2021cv02462
Plaintiff:
Buff City Soap LLC, Buff City Soap Franchising LLC, Buff City Soap Holdings LLC and others
Defendant:
Magen Bynum, Buff City New Albany, LLC, Magnolia Soap & Bath Co. of Oxford, LLC and others
FURS v. DREAMCATCHER BROADCASTING, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02301
Plaintiff:
KING FURS, INC.
Defendant:
DREAMCATCHER BROADCASTING, LLC, THE E.W. SCRIPPS COMPANY, GRIFFIN COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Gills, Jr. v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01076
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Al Shuga v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02373
Plaintiff:
Mussa Al Shuga
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
