Cases 51 - 60 of 1,586
Perry v. Bonguards' South, LLC
as 1:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
Carlyle Perry
Defendant:
Bonguards' South, LLC
Midence v. MJ Framing & Drywall, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02425
Plaintiff:
Marlon Andres Castillo Midence
Defendant:
MJ Framing & Drywall, LLC, Miguel Ortiz, Jose Ortiz and others
Taylor v. Internal Health And Medical Services, LLC
as 2:2023cv02663
Plaintiff:
Linda Taylor
Defendant:
Internal Health And Medical Services, LLC
Carllel v. Waters of Memphis, A Rehabilitation & Nursing Center, LLC
as 2:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Desiree Lanette Carllel
Defendant:
Waters of Memphis, A Rehabilitation & Nursing Center, LLC
Reteguin v. BHS Concrete, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02617
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Reteguin
Defendant:
BHS Concrete, LLC and Joseph J. Brannon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Watt et al v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv02593
Plaintiff:
Robert A Watt, Gary J Friesen, Michael H McKenna and others
Defendant:
FedEx Coporation, FedEx Corporation Employees' Pension Plan, Retirement Plan Investment Board of FedEx Corporation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Craig A. Covic and Mark J. Abbott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Haley v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2023cv02715
Plaintiff:
Tessie Haley
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Ivy v. Intercontinental Hotels Group (Japan), Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02609
Plaintiff:
Tamika Ivy
Defendant:
Intercontinental Hotels Group (Japan), Inc., Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, LLC and Valor Hospitality Partners, LLC
Campbell et al v. Waters of Memphis, A Rehabilitation & Nursing Center, LLC.
as 2:2023cv02691
Plaintiff:
Pamela Campbell and Stacie Gray
Defendant:
Waters of Memphis, A Rehabilitation & Nursing Center, LLC.
Bell v. Hyosung Hico, LTD Company
as 2:2023cv02628
Plaintiff:
Tamara Bell
Defendant:
Hyosung Hico, LTD Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
