Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Woodard v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv02398
Plaintiff:
Lisa Faust-Woodard and Lisa Woodard
Unknown:
Jamita Swearengen
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lesizza v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
Diana Lesizza
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Access Systems, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
SWINDLE v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND CO. et al
as 2:2023cv02442
Plaintiff:
TAMARA SWINDLE
Defendant:
BECTON, DICKINSON AND CO., Bard Access Systems, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DONALD v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01220
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY SAMON DONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01102
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY SAMON DONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peery v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01153
Plaintiff:
Robert Peery
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Dell v. Ethicon et al
as 2:2012cv02632
Plaintiff:
Debbie O'Dell
Defendant:
Inc. Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphree v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02630
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Murphree
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shama v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02573
Plaintiff:
Patricia Shama
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waller v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02229
Plaintiff:
David H. Waller
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
