Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Bridgestone Retail Operations L.L.C. v. Dr. Robert D. Shlens
as 4:2014cv00675
Plaintiff: Bridgestone Retail Operations L.L.C.
Defendant: Dr. Robert D. Shlens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven M. Johnson, PC v. Hanson
as 4:2014cv00612
Plaintiff: Steven M Johnson PC
Defendant: Gary D Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilhite et al v. Acell Investors Limited We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01421
Plaintiff: Michael T Wilhite, Jr , Michael D Thompson , The Williamsburg Corp and others
Defendant: Acell Investors Limited
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Colorado Meadowlark Corp. v. Sage Physician Partners, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00922
Plaintiff: Colorado Meadowlark Corp.
Defendant: Sage Physician Partners, Inc, D. Yale Sage and Kirk R. Short
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stathakis v. Stiner et al
as 2:2010cv00280
Plaintiff: Diann P. Stathakis
Defendant: Robert L. Stiner, Deborah J. Stiner, Thomas F. Roller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FCS Advisors, Inc. d/b/a Brevet Capital Advisors v. CLST Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01963
Plaintiff: FCS Advisors, Inc. d/b/a Brevet Capital Advisors, FCS Advisors, Inc. d/b/a Brevet Capital Advisors and FCS Advisors, Inc. d/b/a Brevet Capital Advisors
Defendant: CLST Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Type: Contract None
Reneker et al v. Offill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01394
Plaintiff: D Ronald Reneker, Amerifirst Acceptance Corp, Jeffrey C Bruteyn and others
Defendant: Phillip W Offill, Jr and Godwin Pappas Ronquillo LLP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?