Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Udoh v. Garland et al
as 3:2021cv03006
Plaintiff:
Uduak Nelson Udoh
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Garzon-Muvdi et al v. Blinken et al
as 3:2021cv01527
Plaintiff:
M G, Tomas Garzon-Muvdi, T G and others
Defendant:
Thomas Parillo, Tracy Renaud, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Cheng v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2021cv01400
Plaintiff:
Pai-Hsueh Cheng
Defendant:
USCIS, Connie Nolan, Gregory A Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Basnet v. Garland et al
as 3:2021cv01286
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Bhoja Basnet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
TMCI Inc et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2021cv00876
Defendant:
Gregory A Richardson, USCIS, Tracy Renaud and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Abd El Rahman Mostafa Mahmoud, TMCI INC., TMCI Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Texas et al v. Joseph R Biden et al
as 2:2021cv00067
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Troy Miller and others
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute and Advocates for Victims of Illegal Alien Crime
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sity Communications Inc et al v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2021cv00595
Plaintiff:
Sity Communications Inc and Karl Kenny
Defendant:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Gregory A Richardson and Tracy Renaud
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Islam v. USCIS et al
as 3:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Brian J Meier, USCIS, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Obaidul Islam
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
