Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Cumo et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cumo and Tiara Alston
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barkley v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Matthew Barkley
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
March v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Andrew March
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nelli v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Nelli
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Montoya v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Mike Montoya
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Alex Petroski, Andrew March, Nicholas Nelli and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EDN Global Inc et al v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
EDN Global Inc doing business as EDN Communication and Jerome Edmondson
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC, AT&T Inc, Steve Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
EDN Global et al v. AT&T Inc.
as 3:2021cv01520
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edmondson and EDN Global doing business as EDN Communication
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, SBC Global Services Inc doing business as AT&T Global Services, AT&T Mobility Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Power Product Services, Inc. et al v. AT&T Inc et al
as 3:2017cv03336
Plaintiff:
Power Product Services Inc , Cover 2 Communications LLC , NB Construction Inc and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rocking T, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
Rocking T, Inc.
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
