Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rivera v. WebTPA Employer Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jesus Rivera
Defendant:
WebTPA Employer Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rivera & Co v. Provence Real Estate LLC
as 3:2023cv02695
Plaintiff:
RIVERA & CO. and Rivera & Co
Defendant:
PROVENCE REAL ESTATE, LLC and Provence Real Estate LLC
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rivera v. State Farm LLoyds et al
as 4:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
Axel Rivera
Defendant:
State Farm LLoyds and David Land
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rivera et al v PayPal Inc
as 3:2019cv01545
Plaintiff:
Oscar Geovanni Rivera, Rivera Business Solutions, Inc. and Rivera Business Solutions Inc
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc. and PayPal Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera et al v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00007
Plaintiff:
Dora Smith, Robert Steven Pritchett, Johnny Mize and others
Defendant:
Bavarian Motor Works and BMW of North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Caris Life Sciences Ltd v. Rivera
as 3:2018cv02734
Plaintiff:
Caris Life Sciences, Ltd. and Caris Life Sciences Ltd
Defendant:
Eric Rivera
Geico Marine Insurance Company v. Gwinn et al
as 1:2018cv00120
Defendant:
Jeremy Gwinn and Chris Rivera
Plaintiff:
Geico Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's
as 4:2016cv00883
Plaintiff:
Nelson Rivera
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Pena et al v. State Farm LLoyds et al
as 3:2016cv02597
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos De La Pena and Alma De La Pena
Defendant:
State Farm LLoyds and Jessica Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2015cv00783
Plaintiff:
Daniela Angelica Rivera
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
