Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Harris v. Western Dental Services Inc et al
as 4:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Delisa M. Harris
Defendant:
Western Dental Services, Inc., Brident Services, LLC and John Does 1-10 4:23-cv-1051-P
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tarpley v. Cash Link USA LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Antonia Tarpley
Defendant:
Cash Link USA LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Simonis v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc et al
as 3:2022cv02770
Plaintiff:
Mathias W Simonis
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc doing business as Chrysler Capital and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Haugen et al v. The National Eating Disorder Association et al
as 3:2020cv03667
Defendant:
National Eating Disorder Association, Chevese Turner, Claire Mysko and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Hope Armos and Sharon Hofstra Haugen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Islamic Center of Irving v. Rahim
as 3:2020cv02579
Defendant:
CO-CONSPIRATORS DOES 1 through 5, FEROZ TOFAYAL, John Does 1 through 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Islamic Center of Irving
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
