Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bentler v. Exxon Mobile Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00335
Defendant:
Neil A Chapman, Exxon Mobile Corporation, Jeffrey J Woodbury and others
Plaintiff:
Martin J Bentler, Amalgamated Bank and State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Steven J. Rando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kimbrell et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Lowrance, Martha Maroon, Jacob Mills and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, VM North America Inc, Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shaffer v. Digital Generation, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01684
Plaintiff:
Anastacia Shaffer
Defendant:
Digital Generation Inc, Neil Nguyen, Scott K Ginsburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Duncan v. Ginsburg et al
as 3:2010cv01769
Plaintiff:
Joel Sean Duncan
Defendant:
Scott Ginsburg, Neil Nguyen and DG Fastchannel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sewell et al v. Millennium State Bank of Texas et al
as 3:2009cv01575
Plaintiff:
Cameron Dee Sewell, Paul C. Sewell, David Sewell and others
Defendant:
Millunnium State Bank of Texas, J.D. Sibilsky, Clyde Hensley and others
Intervenor:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
McPhail et al v. First Command Financial Planning Inc et al
as 4:2008mc00009
Plaintiff:
Michael McPhail, Robert Barr Kimnach, III, Scott Wagner and others
Defendant:
First Command Financial Planning Inc, First Command Financial Services Inc, Lamar C Smith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
