Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Phillips 66 Company v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 351
as 2:2019cv00228
Defendant:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 351
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Asarco LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al
as 3:2018cv02813
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America, Local 104, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Locals 518, 570 and 602 and others
Plaintiff:
Asarco LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
ConocoPhillips Company v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 351
as 2:2007cv00178
Plaintiff:
ConocoPhillips Company and ConocoPhillips Company
Defendant:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 351
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Fanning et al v. Merrick et al
as 4:2007cv00405
Plaintiff:
Michael R Fanning, Board of Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Pipeline Employers Health and Welfare Fund and Board of Trustees of the Hoisting and Portable Engineers Local 178 Apprentice Fund
Defendant:
John Merrick, David B Phillips, Carol Merrick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fanning et al v. Fennell et al
as 3:2007cv00632
Plaintiff:
Michael R Fanning, Board of Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Pipeline Employers Health and Welfare Fund and Board of Trustees of the Hoisting and Portable Engineers Local 178 Apprentice Fund
Defendant:
Alan K Fennell, Alan K Fennell, U-Con Construction Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
