Cases 21 - 30 of 142
Adams v. Meyer
as 4:2017mc02122
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adams
Defendant:
Gerald Meyer
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Raider Surgical Center, LLC et al v. Dantex Partners, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv02062
Plaintiff:
Raider Surgical Center, LLC and Raider Eye, LLC
Defendant:
Dantex Partners, LLC, AD8 South Texas LLC, Aguirre Framing and Construction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Council v. GC Services, LP
as 4:2017cv01814
Plaintiff:
Sharmona Council
Defendant:
GC Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Catacora et al v. Capital One Financial
as 4:2017cv01737
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Catacora , Jalleh Doty , Janet Hatten and others
Defendant:
Capital One Financial
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Sterling v. De Ville Asset Management Limited
as 4:2017cv00780
Plaintiff:
Ty Qoreya Sterling
Defendant:
De Ville Asset Management Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Heironimus v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
James Heironimus
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CLAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2016mc02914
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
United States of America and DOES
Cause Of Action: MS:1013
Chism et al v. Continental Collection Agency Ltd. et al
as 4:2016cv03343
Plaintiff:
Jason Chism and Stacey Chism
Defendant:
Continental Collection Agency Ltd. , Nathan M. Twedt and John and Jane Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Monterossa Salguero v. Franco Argueta
as 4:2016cv02943
Petitioner:
Jose Gustavo Monterossa Salguero
Respondent:
Madonna Alexandra Marce Franco Argueta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11607
Soto v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 4:2016cv02801
Plaintiff:
Elanny Soto
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
