Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Huang et al v. Zhao et al
as 4:2015cv03292
Plaintiff:
Byron Huang , Chiu Hei Ng and Liqiang Sun
Defendant:
Rui Zhao , Chong Yan Han , Hui Zhou Wei and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Estes v. Sterling Bank et al
as 4:2011cv02335
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Estes
Defendant:
Sterling Bank , Chernosky, Smith, Ressling & Smith, PLLC, Raymond Naudin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Robinson et al v. Castle et al
as 4:2011cv00649
Plaintiff:
Albert M. Robinson and Anita Robinson
Defendant:
Jack Huston Castle, Larry Earl Freeman, Kent Ziegenbein and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Adhikari et al v. Daoud & Partners et al
as 4:2009cv01237
Defendant:
Kellogg, Brown & Root International, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., KBR, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ganga Maya Shrestha, Maya Thapa Magar, Satya Narayan Shah and others
Amicus Curiae:
Andrew Chapham, American Civil Liberties Union, Douglass Cassel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Compania Internacional de Comercio, S.A. De C.V. v. Tsuru Group, LLC et al
as 4:2009cv00959
Plaintiff:
Compania Internacional de Comercio, S.A. De C.V.
Defendant:
Tsuru Group, LLC, Masaru Tsuru Kayaba, Masao Tsuru Santa Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brown et al v. U S Home Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv03427
Plaintiff:
Aileen Brown, Terry Charles, Roy Culberson and others
Defendant:
U S Home Corporation, North American Title Group, Inc., VIP Realty of Bonita Springs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Powell et al v. M&N Resources et al
as 4:2007cv02107
Plaintiff:
Madilyn D. Powell and Russell C. Amos
Petitioner:
Mattie Amos
Defendant:
M&N Resource Management LLC, Pierce Dalton Nunley, Susan Moody Nunley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Montelaro v. Principal Residential Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2006cv02882
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
