Cases 101 - 110 of 690
Reynolds III v. Willis of Texas, Inc.
as 4:2021cv01317
Defendant:
Willis of Texas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles V. Reynolds III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Gilbert v. ZO Skin Health, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00621
Defendant:
ZO Skin Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carrington Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garrett v. Hooters of America, LLC
as 4:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Hooters of America, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shara Garrett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Flores et al v. ACCC General Agency, Inc. ACCC Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Carlos Leonardo Delcid, Melanie Whitcomb, Todd Schaffer and others
Defendant:
ACCC General Agency, Inc. D/B/A ACCC Insurance Company and ACCC General Agency,Inc. doing business as ACCC Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Aramesh v. Regis Corporation
as 4:2019cv01770
Plaintiff:
Mandana Alborz Aramesh
Defendant:
Regis Corporation and Regis Corporation doing business as TGF Hair Salon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Earl v. Department Of Labor et al
as 4:2021cv00241
Defendant:
Department Of Labor and Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Mariki Earl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Van Brummen v. Hess Corporation
as 4:2020cv04330
Defendant:
Hess Corporation
Plaintiff:
Christopher Van Brummen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mills v. Reladyne West, LLC
as 4:2020cv03758
Plaintiff:
Jerime Mills
Defendant:
Reladyne West, LLC and Reladyne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc. v. Cajun Industries, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00342
Defendant:
John Mobley, Daniel Caudle, Cajun Industries, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Morris-SheBridge Company, Inc. and Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lisi v. Ahern, Inc.
as 4:2020cv03790
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Lisi
Defendant:
Ahern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
