Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Federation of State Massage Therapy Boards v. Footy Rooty Development, Inc. d/b/a Footy Rooty Institute Houston et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Federation of State Massage Therapy Boards
Defendant:
Footy Rooty Development, Inc. d/b/a Footy Rooty Institute Houston, Xu "Bill" Liu, Shanshan Ariel Cao and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. John Does 1-25
as 4:2014cv02119
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. John Does 1-25
as 4:2014cv02121
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Combat Zone Corp. v. Does 1-192
as 4:2012cv00774
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and Does 1-192
Plaintiff:
Combat Zone Corp.
Interested Party:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
K-Beech, Inc. vs. John Does 1-41
![Featured Case Featured Case](https://static.justia.com/images/icons/star.png)
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2011cv00046
Defendant:
K-Beech, Inc and John Does 1-41
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Raw Films, LTD
![Featured Case Featured Case](https://static.justia.com/images/icons/star.png)
as 3:2011cv00386
Plaintiff:
Raw Films, LTD
Defendant:
John Does 1-36
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-75
![Featured Case Featured Case](https://static.justia.com/images/icons/star.png)
as 3:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Patrick Collins, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-75
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Collins v. Doe et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2010cv02882
Plaintiff:
Leann Collins
Defendant:
John Doe, John Anthony Gray, Gray Entertainment Inc., S.Q. Media Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.