Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,055
Incorrectly Filed
as 7:2024cv00381
Defendant: Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
PHI Health, LLC v. 90 Degree Benefits, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02704
Respondent: 90 Degree Benefits, LLC and XYZ Corp
Petitioner: PHI Health, LLC
Defendant: Deer Creek Feeding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aguilar v. Esworth Rawlings et al
as 4:2024cv03474
Defendant: US Funeral Expenses, Doe Telemarketer(s) 1-100, Doe Insurance Co and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nguyen v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2024cv03442
Defendant: USCIS, UR M. JADDOU, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff: Hung Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Upchurch v. Dhanani et al
as 4:2024cv03367
Defendant: Mark Templin, John Does 1-100 and Shoukat Dhanani
Plaintiff: Kenneth Lamont Upchurch
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Flores v. Lane Bryant, Inc.
as 4:2024cv03318
Plaintiff: Sandra Flores
Defendant: Lane Bryant, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Iraheta v. Iraheta
as 4:2024cv02665
Plaintiff: Margarita Iraheta
Defendant: Jose De La Cruz Iraheta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Loncarevic v. Loncarevic
as 4:2024cv02634
Respondent: Virginia Diana Loncarevic
Petitioner: Boro Loncarevic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11607 Int'l Child Abduction Act
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024mc01399
Defendant: Filed incorrectly
Plaintiff: Filed incorrectly
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Davis v. Trump et al
as 4:2024cv02595
Defendant: Christopher B. Bridges, Donald J. Trump, Shawn Carter and others
Plaintiff: Tremeka L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?