Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Abrams v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Rodney Abrams
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and First Federal Bank, FSB, n/k/a First Federal Bank of Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bissell, et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al.
as 4:2016cv03414
Defendant:
William Bissell , Kimberly Bissell , Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vinson Kasmani v. CitiMortgage, Inc
as 4:2016cv00969
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc
Plaintiff:
Nichole Brianne Vinson Kasmani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phipps v. CitiMortgage, Inc
as 4:2016cv00954
Plaintiff:
Patricia A Phipps
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoyer v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 4:2015cv02679
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC , Primelending, a Plainscapital Company, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Hoyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Mora v. CitiMortgage, Inc
as 7:2014cv00468
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc
Plaintiff:
Enrique De La Mora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2013cv03379
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter and Catherine Carter
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northcutt v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michelle G. Northcutt
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. , Federal National Mortgage and Fannie Mae a/k/a Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gatling v. Citimortgage Inc
as 4:2011cv02879
Defendant:
Citimortgage Inc and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Olive F. Gatling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berger, III v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 4:2011cv02179
Plaintiff:
William J. Berger, III
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
