Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Bechtel v. Superior Offshore International Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv01270
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Bechtel and Jennifer Ann Bechtel
Defendant:
Superior Offshore International Inc., Superior Offshore International Inc., Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lawrenz v. Superior Offshore International, Inc et al DO NOT DOCKET IN (08CV0987) CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER (08cv687)
as 4:2008cv00987
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lawrenz
Defendant:
Superior Offshore International, Inc, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knowles vs Superior Offshore International, Inc et al DO NOT DOCKET IN (8CV722). case is consolidated under (08cv687)
as 4:2008cv00722
Plaintiff:
Bill Knowles
Defendant:
Superior Offshore International, Inc, Louis E Schaefer, James J. Mermis and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
In re: Superior Offshore International, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 4:2008cv00687
Plaintiff:
Robert Brand , Christopher T.H. Pell , Charles Ognar and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc , J. P. Morgan Securities, Inc. , Louis E. Schaefer and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Bill Knowles , Jerome Lawrenz , Jennifer Ann Bechtel and others
Movant:
Jojak Investments Property LTD , Harry Ayvazian , Simon Ormerod and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Powell et al v. M&N Resources et al
as 4:2007cv02107
Plaintiff:
Madilyn D. Powell and Russell C. Amos
Petitioner:
Mattie Amos
Defendant:
M&N Resource Management LLC, Pierce Dalton Nunley, Susan Moody Nunley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pierce v. Quarterman
as 4:2007mc00088
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Pierce and Anthony Leroy Pierce
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
