Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership v. Imperial Freight Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02615
Plaintiff:
Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Imperial Freight Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Robinson v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
as 4:2014cv01410
Plaintiff:
Marni Robinson
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Massinburge v. Abbott et al
as 4:2013cv01615
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Macie D Miller, Frank G Pearce and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Massinburge
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Massinburge v. Abbott et al
as 4:2013mc01116
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Massinburge
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Macie D Miller, Frank G Pearce and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. et al v. Agape Restaurant, LLC, et al
as 4:2013cv01293
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Agape Restaurant, LLC, Moises J. Granados and Brent H. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act
Robinson v. Parker et al.
as 4:2011mc00524
Defendant:
Parker and Patricia Lykos
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eugene Robinson
Robinson v. Houston Narcotics Division et al
as 4:2011mc00451
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson
Defendant:
Houston Narcotics Division and Unknown Officers
Robinson v. Houston Police Department et al B>
as 4:2011mc00452
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson
Defendant:
Houston Police Department and Unknown Officers
Robinson et al v. City of Houston, the Houston Police et al
as 4:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
Albert M. Robinson and Anita Robinson
Defendant:
City of Houston, the Houston Police , Houston Public Works Department , Houston Engineering Department and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
